Interested in training for your team? Click here to learn more

Alice Motions in Patent Infringement Litigation: Timing, Lessons From Recent Litigation

Recording of a 90-minute premium CLE video webinar with Q&A

This program is included with the Strafford CLE Pass. Click for more information.
This program is included with the Strafford All-Access Pass. Click for more information.

Conducted on Thursday, June 22, 2023

Recorded event now available

or call 1-800-926-7926

This CLE webinar will guide patent counsel on Alice motions at the pleading stage in patent infringement litigation. The panel will discuss key considerations when filing these motions. The panel will address Section 101 and the Mayo/Alice test, discussing steps 1 and 2 of the test for abstract ideas. The panel will also use a recent Federal Circuit decision as a case study and discuss best practices for patentees and alleged infringers.

Description

In February 2023, the Federal Circuit issued a precedential opinion in Hawk Technology Systems v. Castle Retail, affirming the granting of the defendants' Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss. The court found that the patent in question claimed ineligible subject matter under Section 101. The Federal Circuit concluded the claims were directed to an abstract idea and failed to transform the abstract idea into patent-eligible subject matter.

The Federal Circuit's opinion demonstrates the application of the Alice test and emphasizes the role of written descriptions and claim language in a Section 101 analysis. Whether an abstract idea is changed into patent-eligible subject matter often depends on the particular subject matter included in the claims and written description.

Listen as our authoritative panel of patent attorneys examines Alice motions at the pleading stage in patent infringement litigation hearings. The panel will discuss key considerations for filing these motions. The panel will address Section 101 and the Mayo/Alice test, discussing steps 1 and 2 of the test for abstract ideas. The panel will also use a recent Federal Circuit decision as a case study. The panel will offer best practices for patentees and alleged infringers.

READ MORE

Outline

  1. Mayo/Alice test and Section 101
  2. Mayo/Alice test for abstract ideas
    1. Step 1
    2. Step 2
  3. Case study: Hawk Technology Systems v. Castle Retail (Fed. Cir. Feb. 17, 2023)
  4. Best practices for patentees and alleged infringers

Benefits

The panel will review these and other key issues:

  • What are the key considerations for Alice motions at the pleading stage in patent infringement litigation?
  • How is strong claim language and written description important to avoiding a dismissal?
  • What guidance does case law provide on filing Alice motions at the pleading stage?

Faculty

Hasford, Justin
Justin J. Hasford

Partner
Finnegan Henderson Farabow Garrett & Dunner

Mr. Hasford has experience in all areas of intellectual property law. His practice focuses on complex patent litigation...  |  Read More

Ochiana, Ph.D., Stefan O.
Stefan O. Ochiana, Ph.D.

Attorney
Finnegan Henderson Farabow Garrett & Dunner

Mr. Ochiana prosecutes and provides strategic counseling on U.S. and foreign patent portfolios in the chemical and...  |  Read More

Access Anytime, Anywhere

Strafford will process CLE credit for one person on each recording. All formats include course handouts.

To find out which recorded format will provide the best CLE option, select your state:

CLE On-Demand Video