Interested in training for your team? Click here to learn more

Concurrently and Ethically Representing Companies, Owners, and Employees in the Same Matter

Strategies for Avoiding Disqualification, Honoring Client's Choice of Counsel, and Managing Privilege and Work Product

An encore presentation with Live Q&A.

Recording of a 90-minute CLE video webinar with Q&A

This program is included with the Strafford CLE Pass. Click for more information.
This program is included with the Strafford All-Access Pass. Click for more information.

Conducted on Thursday, December 28, 2023

Recorded event now available

or call 1-800-926-7926

This CLE webinar will guide outside litigation counsel through the practicalities and applicable ethical rules for avoiding disqualification when they are asked to represent the client as well as the client's members, officers, directors, or employees in the same matter or in depositions. The panelist will also discuss strategies and solutions for anticipating potential conflicts when a key employee-witness leaves the company.

Description

When a business is sued, outside counsel often faces two potentially but common disqualifying scenarios. First, if counsel has a history with the client, and the suit is brought by members or shareholders, the same lawyer or firm is routinely asked to represent them all. Furthermore, even sophisticated owners can fail to understand that counsel for the company is not, by default, their personal lawyer.

Traditionally, courts have required separate counsel except in superficial cases. But courts are more frequently rejecting a rigid approach in favor of assessing the context to determine if the parties' interests are actually aligned. The factors considered vary by type of case.

Second, it is quite common for outside counsel to be asked to "represent" an employee witness at deposition. Whether outside counsel can or should represent is a more complex question than first appears. Counsel must consider the effect of doing so on attorney-client privilege, work product protection, and trial strategy. The dynamics between the unrepresented and represented company witness are entirely different--and things get more complicated if the witness is a former employee.

Listen as Bradley R. Hutter, Attorney at Fafinski Mark & Johnson, guides outside litigation counsel through the practicalities and applicable ethical rules to avoid disqualification when they are asked to represent both a company and its member, officers, directors, or employees in the same matter or in depositions.

READ MORE

Outline

  1. Relevant Model Rules of Professional Responsibility (MR 1.13, 4.3, 4.4)
  2. Representing the company and its owners or management
  3. Client employee depositions
  4. Foreseeing departing employee testimony
  5. Recent cases

Benefits

The panelist will review these and other issues:

  • What is "serious wrongdoing" for purposes of disqualification from representing owners/management and the entity?
  • Must an attorney deal with company employees as unrepresented persons under Model Rule 4.3?
  • Is the employee who is represented by the company's lawyer at a deposition simply an accommodation client?
  • What is the proper way for a corporate client to offer to cover the costs of a current or former employee's representation during a deposition?

An encore presentation featuring Live Q&A.

Faculty

Hutter, Bradley
Bradley R. Hutter
Attorney
Fafinski Mark & Johnson

Mr. Hutter is an Associate in FMJ’s Litigation and Bankruptcy & Insolvency practice groups. He represents...  |  Read More

Access Anytime, Anywhere

Strafford will process CLE credit for one person on each recording. All formats include course handouts.

To find out which recorded format will provide the best CLE option, select your state:

CLE On-Demand Video