Interested in training for your team? Click here to learn more

Daubert Motions in Construction Litigation: Standards for Expert Witnesses in Design and Defect Claims

Raising or Defending Daubert Challenges to Admitting Expert Testimony; Impact of Recent Rule 702 Amendments

Recording of a 90-minute CLE video webinar with Q&A

This program is included with the Strafford CLE Pass. Click for more information.
This program is included with the Strafford All-Access Pass. Click for more information.

Conducted on Tuesday, August 20, 2024

Recorded event now available

or call 1-800-926-7926

This CLE webinar will provide counsel with an analysis of how courts apply the Daubert/Frye standards (and comparable state standards) to the presentation of expert testimony in construction disputes, including any impact that the recently amended Rule 702 may have on the standards' application. The panel will outline practical approaches to raise or defend a challenge to the admission of expert testimony.

Description

In most construction suits, both sides rely on experts to provide opinions and testimony supporting or against claims of liability and damages. Such expert testimony often involves determining fault for design and construction defects, schedule delays, and worker inefficiency. Expert opinion and testimony impact all parties in a construction dispute, including property owners, developers, financial institutions, design professionals, contractors, subcontractors, suppliers, and vendors.

The Daubert/Frye ruling and the body of law on challenging expert opinions and testimony continue to evolve for construction disputes in both state and federal courts. Courts permit testing expert testimony and an expert's foundational methodology or technique to ensure that it is relevant and reliable. And the recently amended Rule 702 will impact such testing and court rulings.

Listen as our panel of construction litigators discusses the applicability of the Daubert/Frye standards to the presentation of expert testimony in construction disputes, analyzes what is required to successfully raise or defend a challenge to the admission of expert testimony, especially in light of the recently amended Rule 702, and provides guidance for using experts in construction cases.

READ MORE

Outline

  1. Dispositive motions in the Daubert hearing: the Daubert challenge
    1. Effect of recent Rule 702 amendments
  2. Frye standards: how they differ from Daubert standards
  3. Application to construction cases
  4. Application to scheduling, construction defects, and damages
  5. Future impact of Daubert/Frye on construction claims
  6. Lessons from court rulings

Benefits

The panel will review these and other key issues:

  • How can counsel effectively challenge a construction expert witness' theories and whether those theories have been tested?
  • What impact will the recent Rule 702 amendments have on expert witness challenges?
  • Under what circumstances should counsel consider not filing a Daubert/Frye motion?
  • How can counsel leverage prior rulings involving a construction expert witness?

Faculty

Adelstein-David
David M. Adelstein

Partner
Kirwin Norris

Mr. Adelstein represents general contractors, subcontractors, design professionals, developers, associations,...  |  Read More

Perrone, Patrick
Patrick J. Perrone

Partner
K&L Gates

Mr. Perrone concentrates his practice on construction and product defect matters. He is an experienced trial attorney...  |  Read More

Access Anytime, Anywhere

Strafford will process CLE credit for one person on each recording. All formats include course handouts.

To find out which recorded format will provide the best CLE option, select your state:

CLE On-Demand Video