Interested in training for your team? Click here to learn more

Induced Infringement in Pharma Litigation: Lessons From Amarin v. Hikma, Guidance for Use of Skinny Labels

Recording of a 90-minute premium CLE video webinar with Q&A

This program is included with the Strafford CLE Pass. Click for more information.
This program is included with the Strafford All-Access Pass. Click for more information.

Conducted on Thursday, August 29, 2024

Recorded event now available

or call 1-800-926-7926

This CLE course will guide patent counsel on issues of inducement in pharmaceutical patent litigation following the Federal Circuit's decision in Amarin Pharma v. Hikma Pharm. The panel will also discuss strategies and tactics regarding claim language and label language, as well as types of evidence to adduce to prove inducement of infringement.

Description

In Amarin Pharma Inc. v. Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. (Fed. Cir. June 25, 2024), the Federal Circuit revived the litigation, reversing the district court's grant of Hikma's motion to dismiss the induced infringement case. Amarin accused generic drugmaker Hikma of infringing its patents on the branded drug. The case draws attention to the challenges facing generics with skinny labels and induced infringement.

The Federal Circuit concluded Amarin plausibly pleaded that Hikma had induced infringement of the asserted patents. The court noted that the theory of induced infringement is not based solely on the label but is based on the label in combination with Hikma's public statements and marketing materials.

The Amarin decision provides some guidance for generics wanting to use skinny labels, emphasizing the importance of being careful when issuing statements, whether in press releases or promotional materials, to minimize the likelihood of infringement.

Listen as our authoritative panel of patent attorneys discusses the Federal Circuit's recent Amarin v. Hikma decision, and any other relevant pharmaceutical litigation, and the implications for induced infringement cases. The panel will also discuss strategies and tactics regarding claim language and label language, as well as types of evidence to adduce to prove inducement of infringement.

READ MORE

Outline

  1. Skinny labels and inducement
  2. Recent court treatment
  3. Implications of Amarin v. Hikma
  4. Demonstrating liability
  5. Best practices

Benefits

The panel will review these and other key issues:

  • What impact will the court's decision in Amarin v. Hikma have on proving induced infringement?
  • What impact will recent decisions have on claim drafting?
  • What strategic considerations should patent owners keep in mind when labeling FDA-approved drugs?

Faculty

Brougher, Joanna
Joanna T. Brougher, Esq., MPH

Owner & Principal
BioPharma Law Group

Ms. Brougher is a patent attorney who focuses on all aspects of services related to patents in the areas of...  |  Read More

Hooson, Sarah
Sarah Hooson

Director, Legal
Merck Sharp & Dohme

Ms. Hooson is director in the Intellectual Property Group at Merck in Rahway, NJ. Her present responsibilities include...  |  Read More

Irving, Thomas
Thomas L. Irving

Partner
The Marbury Law Group

Mr. Irving has 47 years of experience in the field of IP law. His practice includes due diligence, patent prosecution,...  |  Read More

O’Brien, Michelle
Michelle E. O'Brien

Partner, Head of Life Sciences
The Marbury Law Group

Ms. O’Brien has more than 20 years of experience representing domestic and foreign clients of all sizes in...  |  Read More

Access Anytime, Anywhere

Strafford will process CLE credit for one person on each recording. All formats include course handouts.

To find out which recorded format will provide the best CLE option, select your state:

CLE On-Demand Video