Lindke v. Freed and Social Media Use by Municipalities: Applying a New SCOTUS Test for State Action
Developing and Enforcing Policies for Public Employees and Officials
Recording of a 90-minute CLE video webinar with Q&A
This CLE course will examine unique legal issues for municipalities and government officials when developing and enforcing social media policies after Lindke v. Freed, ___ U.S.___(Mar. 15, 2024). The panel will review the holding in Lindke, discuss the latest legal developments, explore future trends, and highlight potential pitfalls.
Outline
- Lindke v. Freed
- Legal considerations for municipalities drafting social media policies
- Best practices for developing and enforcing social media policies
- Predictions for O'Connor-Ratcliff v. Garnier, 601 U. S. ____ (2024)
Benefits
The panel will review these and other key issues:
- When does a public official's social media activity constitute state action under Lindke?
- What are the legal challenges local governments face when developing and implementing social media policies?
- What pitfalls should municipal attorneys consider when drafting and enforcing social media policies?
- What are the recent legal developments and evolving trends concerning social media policies for municipalities?
Faculty
Austin P. Anderson
Attorney
Anderson & Kreiger
Mr. Anderson is an associate in Anderson & Kreiger’s Litigation team. He works with private and public-sector... | Read More
Mr. Anderson is an associate in Anderson & Kreiger’s Litigation team. He works with private and public-sector clients on issues related to public sector law, municipal law, land use and zoning, white collar defense, and internal investigations. Mr. Anderson handles zoning and land use litigation for both private and municipal clients, advises public clients regarding state and federal regulations, and conducts investigations relating to employment law, including sexual harassment. He has also assisted with pro bono matters with organizations including the ACLU, Lawyers for Civil Rights, and the NAACP. Before joining Anderson & Kreiger, Austin served as a Law Clerk to the Honorable Jon D. Levy of the United States District Court for the District of Maine.
CloseMina S. Makarious
Partner
Anderson & Kreiger
Mr. Makarious represents clients on municipal, airport, environmental, and construction matters. His airport work... | Read More
Mr. Makarious represents clients on municipal, airport, environmental, and construction matters. His airport work includes representing airports around the country on the negotiation of complex lease transactions with airlines, including airline use and lease agreements and agreements with airline fuel consortia. Mr. Makarious worked to revise the Massachusetts Department of Transportation’s Aeronautics regulations, and works with the Department’s Aeronautics Division on matters regarding the use and regulation of drones. He has also assisted a private manufacturer of drone technologies in obtaining a waiver from the FAA for the use of drones beyond the visual line of sight, one of the first such waivers ever granted by the FAA.
Close