Interested in training for your team? Click here to learn more

Rendering Structured Finance Opinions of Counsel: Substantive Consolidation, Authority to File Bankruptcy, and More

Navigating Assumptions, Qualifications, Limitations and Use of Letters; Reducing Risks for Opinion Givers

Recording of a 90-minute premium CLE video webinar with Q&A

This program is included with the Strafford CLE Pass. Click for more information.
This program is included with the Strafford All-Access Pass. Click for more information.

Conducted on Tuesday, April 2, 2024

Recorded event now available

or call 1-800-926-7926

This CLE course will provide commercial finance counsel with a review of the use of opinion letters in structured finance transactions, explain various elements of the opinions, and outline best practices for the opinion giver to minimize risks. The course will focus in particular on true sale and substantive non-consolidation opinions, which are generally considered essential in transactions involving the securitization of financial assets.

Description

The key concept for structured finance is the isolation of the financed assets in a "bankruptcy remote" special purpose vehicle (SPV). SPVs are frequently formed as LLCs and statutory trusts, particularly Delaware Statutory Trusts. The basic concept is that, once the financed assets have been transferred to an SPV, purchasers of securities (whether debt or equity) issued by the SPV should no longer be concerned about the credit risks of the former owner of the financed assets (usually the entity that originated the financed assets), the entity that formed the SPV, or other affiliates of the entity that formed the SPV.

The isolation of the financed assets is achieved by two fundamental structuring techniques. First, the transfer of the financed assets to the SPV must be a "true sale." Second, the SPV itself must be "bankruptcy remote."

A true sale opinion is a reasoned analysis that addresses--but of course cannot establish--that the transfer of the financed assets is a transfer of the complete ownership in consideration of whatever the SPV pays to the transferor. The alternative would be the grant of a lien or security interest in the financed assets as collateral for a loan made by the SPV to the transferor.

A substantive non-consolidation opinion addresses--but of course cannot establish--that the bankruptcy of the parent entity of the SPV (and usually certain other affiliates) would not result in the substantive consolidation of the assets and liabilities of the SPV with those of the parent (and, if applicable, the other affiliates).

If the isolation of the financed assets is successful, then, for example, if the parent of the SPV were to enter bankruptcy, the parent's bankruptcy estate would own only the equity interest in the SPV and have no continuing interest in the financed assets. In other words, the SPV, and only the SPV, would be the owner of the financed assets, and therefore the purchasers of securities issued by the SPV would be unaffected by the bankruptcy of the SPV's parent (or, if a different party, the bankruptcy of the former owner of the financed assets).

Listen as our authoritative panel of practitioners discusses drafting opinions of counsel in structured finance transactions with particular emphasis on rendering true sale opinions and substantive non-consolidation opinions, and best practices for the opinion giver to minimize risks.

READ MORE

Outline

  1. Overview: Why structured finance?
    1. Borrower perspective
    2. Lender perspective
  2. Certain characteristics of entity
    1. Mechanisms to prevent dissolution
    2. Bankruptcy remoteness
      1. Ownership of only the financed assets
      2. Restrictions on scope of business activities to ownership and collection of financed assets
      3. Requirement for independent director or manager to authorize bankruptcy
      4. Efficacy of limitations on authority to file for bankruptcy
  3. “Reasoned” opinion letters
    1. Substantive non-consolidation
    2. True sale
    3. Assumptions, qualifications, exclusions, and reliance

Benefits

The panel will review these and other key issues:

  • How should the opinion giver address the issue of bankruptcy remoteness--what are the limitations, assumptions, and qualifications that the opinion giver should consider?
  • What key issues should the opinion giver address in a substantive non-consolidation opinion?
  • What key issues should the opinion giver address in a true sale opinion?
  • What are the bankruptcy risks for parties providing financing to a structured finance SPV?

Faculty

Antonoff, Rick
Rick Antonoff

Senior Counsel
Blank Rome

Mr. Antonoff represents banks, non-banks and other direct lenders, alternative investment funds, private equity firms,...  |  Read More

Dubin, Alan
Alan S. Dubin

Partner
ArentFox Schiff

For over 25 years, Mr. Dubin served as Chairman of the firm’s Committee on Opinion Letters Rendered in Commercial...  |  Read More

Wolson, Craig
Craig A. Wolson, Esq.

President
Wolson Consulting Group

Mr. Wolson specializes in derivatives, structured finance/securitization, finance and securities matters. His...  |  Read More

Access Anytime, Anywhere

Strafford will process CLE credit for one person on each recording. All formats include course handouts.

To find out which recorded format will provide the best CLE option, select your state:

CLE On-Demand Video