Interested in training for your team? Click here to learn more

SEC Enforcement Actions After Jarkesy: Restrictions on SEC's Pursuit of Civil Penalties

Recording of a 90-minute premium CLE video webinar with Q&A

This program is included with the Strafford CLE Pass. Click for more information.
This program is included with the Strafford All-Access Pass. Click for more information.

Conducted on Tuesday, September 17, 2024

Recorded event now available

or call 1-800-926-7926

This CLE webinar will discuss the U.S. Supreme Court's recent decision in Securities and Exchange Commission v. Jarkesy and its impact on future enforcement actions where the SEC seeks civil monetary penalties. The panel will provide an overview and background of the decision, analyze the decision's potential impact on current and future SEC enforcement actions, and explore what questions the decision left unanswered and how these issues will likely play out in the future.

Description

On June 27, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its much-anticipated opinion in SEC v. Jarkesy holding that when the SEC seeks to impose civil monetary penalties for securities fraud, it must do so in the federal courts rather than before administrative law judges (ALJs). Prior to this ruling, the SEC could elect to litigate fraud cases before ALJs with subject matter expertise.

In construing the SEC's antifraud provisions, the Court found that these types of claims were analogous to common law fraud and therefore "must be heard by a jury." Rejecting the SEC's argument that the "public rights" exception applied, the Court further explained that if a claim is "in the nature of an action at common law, then the matter presumptively concerns private rights, and adjudication by an Article III court is mandatory."

The Jarkesy decision is generally seen as a win for defendants in SEC enforcement actions and provides a basis for challenging the SEC's election of an ALJ in other types of actions beyond fraud. However, the decision left several unanswered questions which will likely result in future litigation for years to come.

Listen as our expert panel analyzes the Jarkesy decision and its potential impact on current and future SEC enforcement actions and provides insights on advising clients on the impact of this decision going forward.

READ MORE

Outline

  1. Background of SEC v. Jarkesy
  2. SEC's use of ALJs
  3. Supreme Court's decision in Jarkesy
  4. Application of Jarkesy to SEC administrative proceedings
  5. What the Jarkesy decision means for current and future SEC enforcement actions
  6. Client impact
  7. Questions/issues the Court left unanswered in Jarkesy and the implications going forward

Benefits

The panel will review these and other important considerations:

  • What is the factual background of SEC v. Jarkesy?
  • What are the key takeaways of the Court's decision and the implications for future SEC enforcement actions?
  • Does the Jarkesy holding apply only to antifraud administrative proceedings or to all SEC administrative proceedings seeking penalties?
  • How should counsel advise clients going forward in light of the Jarkesy decision?
  • What issues did the Court not address and will these unanswered questions likely lead to future litigation?

Faculty

DeFranco, Thomas
Thomas P. DeFranco

Of Counsel
Davis Wright Tremaine

Mr. DeFranco is a seasoned litigator who focuses his practice on securities and complex commercial litigation,...  |  Read More

MacPhail, Thomas
Michael R. MacPhail

Partner
Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath

With more than three decades of experience in securities regulation and enforcement, Mr. MacPhail represents publicly...  |  Read More

Marlier, Haimavathi
Haimavathi V. Marlier

Partner; Co-Chair Securities Litigation, Enforcement, and White Collar Defense Group; Co-Lead Fintech Practice
Morrison & Foerster

Drawing on her experience as a former SEC Senior Trial Counsel, Ms. Marlier represents public and private companies,...  |  Read More

Access Anytime, Anywhere

Strafford will process CLE credit for one person on each recording. All formats include course handouts.

To find out which recorded format will provide the best CLE option, select your state:

CLE On-Demand Video