Interested in training for your team? Click here to learn more

Structuring Consensual Third-Party Releases in Chapter 11 Plans After Purdue Pharma

When Consensual Releases Are Permitted, Protections, Defining and Obtaining Consent, Effect on Claims, Court's Gatekeeper Role

A live 90-minute CLE video webinar with interactive Q&A

This program is included with the Strafford CLE Pass. Click for more information.
This program is included with the Strafford All-Access Pass. Click for more information.

Monday, December 9, 2024

1:00pm-2:30pm EST, 10:00am-11:30am PST

Early Registration Discount Deadline, Friday, November 15, 2024

or call 1-800-926-7926

This CLE webinar will review how courts are evaluating third-party (non-debtor) releases in Chapter 11 plans post-Purdue. We will focus on: (i) when third-party releases may be permissible; (ii) factors courts consider in deciding whether to confirm a plan containing third-party releases; (iii) what constitutes consent; (iv) the permissible scope of releases; (v) what claims cannot be released; and (vi) how to structure, obtain approval for (or object to), and administer releases. We will also discuss the bankruptcy court's "gatekeeping" role as a factor in the debate.

Description

Stakeholders are navigating the landscape of releases since Purdue ended non-consensual third-party releases.

Purdue, however, left open the question of what constitutes a consensual third-party release. To date, there is no uniform definition of consent in the context of third-party releases.

Listen as this experienced panel discusses which third-party entities can obtain releases for what claims and how these releases are negotiated, structured, and granted in order to avoid the problem of non-consensual releases.

READ MORE

Outline

  1. Factors courts consider in deciding whether to permit releases
  2. Structure and scope of permissible releases
  3. Consequences when releases are not consented to
  4. Strategies for release for proponents and objectors

Benefits

The panel will discuss these and other key issues:

  • What parties typically seek and are granted releases?
  • Does consent resolve the Section 524(e) debate?
  • Whether a creditor’s unimpaired status is sufficient for deemed consent?
  • How should consents be structured: opt-out, opt-in?
  • What is the effect of not granting a release?

Faculty

Chavez, Jordan
Jordan Chavez

Associate
Haynes Boone

Ms. Chavez is an associate in the Restructuring Practice Group of Haynes and Boone. Since joining the firm, she has...  |  Read More

Wyrick, Martha
Martha Wyrick

Associate
Haynes and Boone

Ms. Wyrick is an associate in the Restructuring Practice Group in the Dallas office of Haynes and Boone. Her practice...  |  Read More

Attend on December 9

Early Discount (through 11/15/24)

Cannot Attend December 9?

Early Discount (through 11/15/24)

You may pre-order a recording to listen at your convenience. Recordings are available 48 hours after the webinar. Strafford will process CLE credit for one person on each recording. All formats include course handouts.

To find out which recorded format will provide the best CLE option, select your state:

CLE On-Demand Video

Download