Interested in training for your team? Click here to learn more

Structuring Joint Bidding Agreements for Private Equity Funds in M&A: Key Considerations

Confidentiality, Engagement of Advisors, Due Diligence, Cost Sharing, Communications Protocols, Deal Structuring

Recording of a 90-minute premium CLE webinar with Q&A

This program is included with the Strafford CLE Pass. Click for more information.
This program is included with the Strafford All-Access Pass. Click for more information.

Conducted on Wednesday, April 3, 2019

Recorded event now available

or call 1-800-926-7926

This CLE course will examine legal and tactical issues which should be considered by private equity and alternative investment funds when they elect to participate jointly in bidding for a target company or asset. The panel's discussion will include key considerations that should be addressed in a joint bidding agreement.

Description

Increasingly, investment funds are teaming up for joint investments in companies of all sizes, from large public company targets to local, privately held assets. This practice was common before the 2008 financial crisis and has begun to reemerge as a common investment tactic for sophisticated financial sponsors. Co-bidding relationships may be established on an ongoing basis under a joint venture entity or other jointly-owned special purpose acquisition vehicle, and, typically, they are initially documented with a joint bidding agreement.

A well-drafted joint bidding agreement serves as a useful guidepost in setting expectations and avoiding misunderstandings during a joint bid process in a competitive M&A auction. Since the objectives and risk tolerances of co-bidders can be different, there is potential for disagreement among co-bidders as to certain substantive and procedural aspects of the submission and finalization of a joint bid.

One example of a potentially contentious aspect of a joint bidding relationship is the due diligence investigation that will be conducted by the bidding consortium. Co-bidders must decide whether to divide the due diligence effort among themselves equally or whether a lead member will be primarily responsible for vetting the investment, with other members relying on the lead member’s efforts. A useful joint bidding agreement should also clearly set forth how parties would share due diligence expenses.

Further, joint bid transaction structuring questions may require lead time to address. Should a new investment vehicle be formed? Should each co-bidding sponsor create its own wholly owned acquisition vehicle that will then participate in joint venture acquisition? Should these entities be formed at the bid stage or only after winning exclusivity with the target?

Listen as our experienced panel discusses joint bidding agreements and some of the critical structuring, communication, and associated due diligence issues that sponsors and their counsel should consider in such situations.

READ MORE

Outline

  1. Permissible use of joint bidding agreements in M&A auctions and other scenarios
  2. Transaction structuring matters
  3. Confidentiality obligations and noncompetition covenants among co-bidders
  4. Selection and engagement of third-party transaction advisors
  5. Communications protocol between the consortium and the target
  6. Cost sharing
  7. Due diligence planning
  8. Termination and withdrawal rights

Benefits

The panel will review these and other key issues:

  • What are the upfront issues to resolve before entering into a joint bidding agreement?
  • How should the parties address the engagement of transaction advisers, or conducting due diligence on assets to be acquired, in the joint bidding agreement?
  • What are the primary concerns regarding communications with the target during the auction process and what should the joint bidding agreement say about such communications?
  • When should parties be entitled to withdraw from or terminate a joint bidding relationship and how should transaction costs be allocated?

Faculty

Duncan, Sawyer
Sawyer D. Duncan

Atty
King & Spalding

Mr. Duncan is a member of the firm’s Corporate, Finance & Investments Practice Group. His practice focuses on...  |  Read More

Patel, Rahul
Rahul Patel

Partner
King & Spalding

Mr. Patel focuses on mergers and acquisitions, joint ventures and strategic corporate transactions. He is co-chair of...  |  Read More

Access Anytime, Anywhere

Strafford will process CLE credit for one person on each recording. All formats include course handouts.

To find out which recorded format will provide the best CLE option, select your state:

CLE On-Demand Video