Tort Reform and Injuries Occurring Outside the Forum State: Issue by Issue Conflicts of Laws Analysis
Recording of a 90-minute CLE webinar with Q&A
This CLE course will explore the advantages to be gained when personal injury attorneys pay attention to often overlooked, but increasingly important, choice of law issues.
Outline
- Prevailing method of resolving conflicts of laws
- Distinguishing substantive and procedural rules
- Most significant tort reforms to preserve
- Statutes of limitation vs. repose
- Substantive vs. procedural issues
- Bifurcation
- Damages caps
- Privilege issues
Benefits
The panel will review these and other crucial matters.
- Prevailing methods of resolving conflicts of laws
- Changes in choice of law analysis since the Second Restatement of Conflicts
- Issues where choice of law can be outcome determinative
- When to start thinking about choice of law questions
- Other factors influencing forum choice, such as juror attitudes and quality of judicial personnel
Faculty
James W. Balmer
Founding Partner
Falsani Balmer Peterson & Balmer
Mr. Balmer has represented thousands of people in all kinds of litigation, including jury trials, workers’... | Read More
Mr. Balmer has represented thousands of people in all kinds of litigation, including jury trials, workers’ compensation trials and hearings, social security disability hearings, and appeals in those areas. He has handled car crash, slip-and-fall, work site injuries, defective product claims, dog attack, liquor liability claims and other kinds of bodily injury matters. Mr. Balmer has lectured at various seminars, primarily in the areas of trial tactics and workers’ compensation issues.
CloseDavid Randolph Smith
Attorney
David Randolph Smith & Associates
Mr. Smith is a personal injury lawyer with decades of experience. As a seasoned Nashville injury lawyer, he has... | Read More
Mr. Smith is a personal injury lawyer with decades of experience. As a seasoned Nashville injury lawyer, he has successfully argued Tennessee personal injury lawsuits before the Tennessee Supreme Court.
Close