Interested in training for your team? Click here to learn more

Trademarks, Parody, and the First Amendment: Guidance From the Supreme Court's Jack Daniel's Decision

Recording of a 90-minute premium CLE video webinar with Q&A

This program is included with the Strafford CLE Pass. Click for more information.
This program is included with the Strafford All-Access Pass. Click for more information.

Conducted on Tuesday, July 25, 2023

Recorded event now available

or call 1-800-926-7926

This CLE webinar will guide IP counsel on trademark infringement in the context of parodies. The panel will discuss the Supreme Court's recent decision and the guidance it provides as to assertion of First Amendment rights and the tests that will be used to determine infringement. The panel will discuss the Rogers test and source-identifying uses and will offer best practices for enforcing trademarks or avoiding infringement.

Description

In a recent decision, Jack Daniel’s Props. Inc. v. VIP Prods. L.L.C. (June 8, 2023) the Supreme Court considered the balance between trademark rights and First Amendment interests. The Court vacated the Ninth Circuit's decision, concluding that VIP Products, who sells dog toys designed to look like Jack Daniel's whiskey bottles, could not avail itself of the Rogers test.

The Court rejected the Ninth Circuit's belief that because Bad Spaniels "communicates a humorous message," it automatically is entitled to Rogers First Amendment protection. The Court held that the use of the federally registered whiskey bottle along with a similar name functioned as a trademark for VIP and must therefore be analyzed under the likelihood of confusion test.

As a result of this decision, brand owners will be able to bypass the Rogers test when enforcing their trademark rights in certain contexts even where there are arguable First Amendment interests involved. Utilizing the Rogers test as a defense to short-circuit the need for a full likelihood of confusion analysis, as is typical in trademark cases, will now be less clear as an option, given this unanimous Supreme Court decision. More speech defenses in trademark infringement and dilution cases will now be tested directly under the likelihood of confusion and dilution tests. How and when the Rogers test will be applied going forward remains to be seen as well as when the challenged use will qualify as source-identifying. Brand owners will likely leverage the decision to aggressively enforce their trademark rights.

Listen as our authoritative panel of IP attorneys examines trademark protection, infringement, and dilution in the context of parodies. The panel will discuss the Supreme Court's recent decision in Jack Daniel's Properties Inc. v. VIP Products L.L.C. and the guidance it provides as to the assertion of First Amendment rights and the tests that will be used to determine liability. The panel will discuss the Rogers test, source-identifying uses, best practices for enforcing trademark rights, and strategies for avoiding successful trademark infringement and dilution claims.

READ MORE

Outline

  1. Background: balancing trademarks, parody, and the First Amendment
  2. Jack Daniel's Properties Inc. v. VIP Products L.L.C. (U.S. June 8, 2023)
  3. The Rogers test and implications of the Jack Daniel’s decision
  4. Best practices concerning issues of trademark use and registration
    1. From the plaintiff's and defendant's perspective
    2. Possible implications before the TTAB concerning the right to register

Benefits

The panel will review these and other critical issues:

  • What lessons can IP counsel draw from the Supreme Court's decision as to the application of the Rogers test?
  • When will a challenged use constitute a trademark use?
  • What does the decision mean for the First Amendment exception where parody or other expressive use is used as a trademark?

Faculty

Baird, Stephen
Stephen R. Baird

Shareholder
Greenberg Traurig

Mr. Baird works with clients to address their most difficult trademark problems. He provides strategic guidance on...  |  Read More

Farley, Christine
Professor Christine Haight Farley

Professor of Law
American University Washington College of Law

Professor Farley specializes in information law and teaches courses on contract law, intellectual property, advertising...  |  Read More

Access Anytime, Anywhere

Strafford will process CLE credit for one person on each recording. All formats include course handouts.

To find out which recorded format will provide the best CLE option, select your state:

CLE On-Demand Video