U.S. Tax Law After Loper Bright and Corner Post: Key Issues and Ramifications for IRS, Treasury, and Taxpayers
Recording of a 90-minute premium CLE/CPE video webinar with Q&A
This CLE/CPE webinar will provide guidance to tax counsel and advisers on notable U.S. Supreme Court decisions in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo and Corner Post Inc. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. The panel will discuss the significant impact these decisions will have on IRS, Treasury, and other agency policies and the effect the Court's decisions will have on rulemaking, adjudication, and litigation in the tax law context.
Outline
- Introduction: a brief history of the Chevron deference doctrine
- Loper Bright v. Raimondo
- Corner Post v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
- Legislative and regulatory effect
- Regulatory challenges and litigation
- Practitioner takeaways
Benefits
The panel will review these and other important issues:
- How will Loper Bright impact tax regulations and litigation?
- What effect will Corner Post have on litigation challenging agency rules?
- How may the decisions affect regulatory rulemaking?
- What is the potential impact of the decisions on taxpayers?
Faculty
James (Jim) Dawson
Partner
Holland & Knight
Mr. Dawson is a highly experienced tax litigator and business advisor with extensive knowledge resolving Internal... | Read More
Mr. Dawson is a highly experienced tax litigator and business advisor with extensive knowledge resolving Internal Revenue Service (IRS) controversies in audit, appeals and litigation. His practice focuses on representing corporations and individual taxpayers in tax controversy and tax litigation matters.
Close
Christopher S. Rizek
Partner
Holland & Knight
Mr. Rizek is a tax attorney in Holland & Knight's Washington, D.C., office. He represents taxpayers in all... | Read More
Mr. Rizek is a tax attorney in Holland & Knight's Washington, D.C., office. He represents taxpayers in all types of federal civil and criminal tax controversy matters. Mr. Rizek guides clients through IRS audits, prepares administrative claims and protests of IRS actions, and litigates tax and tax-related cases in U.S. district and appellate courts, the U.S. Court of Federal Claims and U.S. Tax Court. In recent years, he has represented numerous taxpayers, financial entities and professional firms in connection with IRS examinations of tax shelters and related compliance and professional ethics issues. Prior to joining Holland & Knight, Mr. Rizek was a tax attorney for a national law firm in its Washington, D.C., office.
Close
Chad M. Vanderhoef
Partner
Holland & Knight
Mr. Vanderhoef is a tax attorney based in Holland & Knight's Tampa office, where he focuses his practice... | Read More
Mr. Vanderhoef is a tax attorney based in Holland & Knight's Tampa office, where he focuses his practice on tax controversy and litigation, offshore tax and reporting compliance (e.g., Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts / FBARs, international information returns), cross-border tax planning, and foreign investment in U.S. real estate. His practice includes representing clients in tax controversy matters, including U.S. Tax Court and federal district and appellate court litigation, as well as Internal Revenue Service (IRS) examination and appeals. In addition, Mr. Vanderhoef advises clients in connection with IRS tax and reporting remediation options. He also advises clients in connection with cross-border restructuring matters, including foreign investment in U.S. real estate.
Close